[bomp] Re:8 miles high /why?

[Career Records <eldeluxe@xxxxxxx>]

well I'm one who digs the RCA version. I don't know if it's better, but it's so differenet as to be a revalation. Sounds more relaxed, which is maybe why Crosby and McG like it. The single version
works better as a single. Then there is the issue of Why? I like the raga rock b-side better than the album take, but I like that one too.

RS

>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Sun, 3 Oct 2004 23:27:41 EDT
> From: Sknoof@aol.com
> Subject: [bomp] Re: 8 miles high
>
> << i've heard a lot of other people (including crosby and mcguinn) refer to
> the
> original 12/65 version of "eight miles high" as the superior version. am i
> the
> only person who thinks the single version blows it out of the water? >>
>
> Nope.  I've never understood why anyone would think the 12/65 was better.
> What a mighty mighty disappointment it was when I finally heard it...
>
> ------------------------------
>

-- Ronald Sanchez
Director Of A&R
Career Records
 www.CareerRecords.com

The Donovan's Brain Web Site
 www.Donovans-Brain.com

===> To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe bomp" to majordomo@xnet2.com <===