[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [bomp] Chesterfield Kings on Conan
- To: bomp@xxxxxxxxx, bomp@xxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [bomp] Chesterfield Kings on Conan
- From: todd <retodd@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2007 23:08:24 -0400 (EDT)
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=earthlink.net; b=fWFoeNEE3WOIpyYgc7oibNyJYISU4OMSXLPPbinObtjF11H+X802Mn4oC1X0tSjT; h=Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:To:Subject:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Mailer:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP;
- Reply-to: bomp@xxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-bomp@xxxxxxxxx
how much have they changed in 10 months? i saw em last fall and they were really fun/funny....goofy and loose and the songs were good. they had snotty attitude and tunes to match and the dudes selling hot dogs totally dug em! todd
-----Original Message-----
>From: Blair Buscareno <blairb@mac.com>
>Sent: Sep 16, 2007 2:11 PM
>To: bomp@xnet2.com
>Subject: Re: [bomp] Chesterfield Kings on Conan
>
>
>PETEP@aol.com wrote:
>> I have trouble with a 50+ year old lead singer with such glam looks. Just
>> like I can't watch Steve Tyler or Mick Jagger anymore. It seems forced when you
>> try to act & look 18 and you are closer to 65.
>>
>> I would rather hear them than see them at this point. But I did order their
>> new CD recently.
> While I understand your point, Pete, I'm not all that worried about
>what Greg looks like, but rather whether I like the song and the
>performance.
>
>
>Rocky Serkowney wrote:
>>
>> Hey,
>>
>> We caught this on TV and were pretty underwhelmed. It's like the
>> Kings going through a similar cycle as they did in the late 80's/90's
>> towards a more 70's Stones/Dolls sound. Maybe they're bored with the
>> 60's again.
>
> Yeah, it does sound more 70s Stones/Dolls...Personally, I really
>liked the song.
>
>===> To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe bomp" to majordomo@xnet2.com <===
===> To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe bomp" to majordomo@xnet2.com <===