From: owner-bomp-digest@xnet2.com (bomp-digest) To: bomp-digest@xnet2.com Subject: bomp-digest V2001 #87 Reply-To: bomp Sender: owner-bomp-digest@xnet2.com Errors-To: owner-bomp-digest@xnet2.com Precedence: bulk X-To-Unsubscribe: Send e-mail to majordomo@xnet2.com with "unsubscribe bomp-digest" in the body X-Bomp-web-site: http://www.bomp.com X-BompList-Administrator: efd@xnet2.com bomp-digest Monday, February 12 2001 Volume 2001 : Number 087 This is the digest version of the Bomp list. ***HOW TO UNSUBSCRIBE:*** Send an e-mail with the words "unsubscribe bomp-digest" to majordomo@xnet2.com or go to . Here's what people are yacking about in this digest: Re: bomp-digest V2001 #86 "David Meyer" Re: bomp-digest V2001 #86 "David Meyer" Februaries 11 & 12 Jan.Roerhorst@prismant.nl Vegan restaurants (ignore if not interested) Boldface Re: Shake Some Action "Jeroen Vedder" Radio Rumpus Room 2/9/01 playlist Ron Thums Rockpile reissue!?!?!? "Lindholm, Jeffrey" Rockpile reissue!?!?!? "Lindholm, Jeffrey" Turning 35 yeeyeemgt@webtv.net (Michael Quirk) RE: Texas garage compilations "Lisa Rickenberg" getting paid jschwart@voicenet.com Groovies' "When I Heard Your Name" jschwart@voicenet.com Re: Rockpile reissue!?!?!? Iam Fuzzco Re: getting paid Iam Fuzzco Re: getting paid Iam Fuzzco RE: bomp-digest V2001 #86 Alan Wright RE: getting paid "Lindholm, Jeffrey" Attention Austin Bomp-ers! "Evan Davies" RE: CCR/KKK Alan Wright RE: Rockpile reissue!?!?!? "Lindholm, Jeffrey" Re: Compilation Standards "Roberto Feruglio" Re: Compilation Standards james Vacation in Spain with Los Straitjackets... "Linda" Re: CCR/KKK (I seriously doubt it) Redlabour@cs.com ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 07:38:28 -0500 From: "David Meyer" Subject: Re: bomp-digest V2001 #86 You are, of couse, quite correct. I chose my words poorly, which was the unintended result of a very very long workweek and three rehearsals. By no means should we support crap for the purpose of propagating more crap. I, also, feel no obligation, per se, to support anyone. What I was really trying to say is rather targeted to those who believe that, just because those who release comps put a lot of personal time, effort, etc, into the endeavor, this justifies not obtaining releases, paying royalties, etc. Believe me, I think all these great people for their efforts as much as anyone else. However, the original poster was essentially arguing the position that, "Without Tim's work those bands wouldn't get heard, so they should be thankful." (paraphrasing) That is true. But without such wylde recordings made back in the day, the compilers would have nothing to release. I honesly have no bloody idea how my earlier post strayed so far from that point...maybe the time at which I wrote it. And yeah, I'm a big fan of certain modern bands (Woggles, Mooney Suzuki, Waistcoats, Embrooks, others) Dave M jschwart responded, > > My feelings on the subject are somewhat conflicted. > Iam, agree that putting more money in Tim, Miriam, > Todd, Tony the Tyger's pockets, etc., is a GOOD thing, > because it hopefully ensures we'll get more great > current garage bands. But I think the answer there is > to make sure enough of us buy the NEW bands to make > their continuing efforts to release such stuff a worthwhile > endeavor. > >> Why do you feel that this is such a self-evident truth? Even aside from the >> underlying opinion that "great" current garage music is worth listening to >> at all (I think 99% of new, so-called garage music is completely boring; >> you apparently like a lot of it -- and neither of us can prove that the >> other's taste is wrong). >> >> But even if you like these bands, why do you think it is more important to >> support new music than old music? That's like saying you have to support >> local bands, even if they stink. >> >> I personally feel no obligation to help keep young bands in vintage gear >> and hot rod stickers, or to encourage their dreams of quitting their day >> jobs. If that happens for them, more power to 'em, but it's not my >> responsibility. > ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 07:38:28 -0500 From: "David Meyer" Subject: Re: bomp-digest V2001 #86 You are, of couse, quite correct. I chose my words poorly, which was the unintended result of a very very long workweek and three rehearsals. By no means should we support crap for the purpose of propagating more crap. I, also, feel no obligation, per se, to support anyone. What I was really trying to say is rather targeted to those who believe that, just because those who release comps put a lot of personal time, effort, etc, into the endeavor, this justifies not obtaining releases, paying royalties, etc. Believe me, I think all these great people for their efforts as much as anyone else. However, the original poster was essentially arguing the position that, "Without Tim's work those bands wouldn't get heard, so they should be thankful." (paraphrasing) That is true. But without such wylde recordings made back in the day, the compilers would have nothing to release. I honesly have no bloody idea how my earlier post strayed so far from that point...maybe the time at which I wrote it. And yeah, I'm a big fan of certain modern bands (Woggles, Mooney Suzuki, Waistcoats, Embrooks, others) Dave M jschwart responded, > > My feelings on the subject are somewhat conflicted. > Iam, agree that putting more money in Tim, Miriam, > Todd, Tony the Tyger's pockets, etc., is a GOOD thing, > because it hopefully ensures we'll get more great > current garage bands. But I think the answer there is > to make sure enough of us buy the NEW bands to make > their continuing efforts to release such stuff a worthwhile > endeavor. > >> Why do you feel that this is such a self-evident truth? Even aside from the >> underlying opinion that "great" current garage music is worth listening to >> at all (I think 99% of new, so-called garage music is completely boring; >> you apparently like a lot of it -- and neither of us can prove that the >> other's taste is wrong). >> >> But even if you like these bands, why do you think it is more important to >> support new music than old music? That's like saying you have to support >> local bands, even if they stink. >> >> I personally feel no obligation to help keep young bands in vintage gear >> and hot rod stickers, or to encourage their dreams of quitting their day >> jobs. If that happens for them, more power to 'em, but it's not my >> responsibility. > ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 14:13:24 +0100 From: Jan.Roerhorst@prismant.nl Subject: Februaries 11 & 12 Hi y'all, Got time for the old days? Not? TUFF! Yesterday & Today anyway! On February 11, in 1963, the Beatles recorded 10 songs at London's Abbey Road Studios to complete the 14 that would form their "Please please me" debut lp. "Love me do" and "PS I love you" had been recorded on September 11, 1962 and "Please please me" and "Ask me why" on November 26 of that year. Grab your own copy to figure out those 10 songs recorded today in 1963; 1963, Ben E. King recorded "I (who have nothing)", in New York; 1968, the Beatles were scheduled to be filmed while recording "Lady Madonna" at Abbey Road. Being quite productive at the time, they instead recorded an altogether new song in front of the film crew: "Hey bulldog", recording the basic tracks and overdubs in a 4 pm to 2 am session. Soon after this session, on Fabruary 15 the Beatles left for India, to drink tea and take yoga classes... 1968, Pink Floyd recorded a BBC session, playing "Vegetable man", "Pow R Toc H", "Scream thy last scream" and "Jugband blues". The session is/was available thru' a boot called "Syd Barrett, unforgotten hero"; 1968, the Who recorded "Little Billy" at London's IBC Studios; 1969, Jimi Hendrix recorded "It's too bad" at New York's Record Plant; 1980, the Blue Oyster Cult played a gig at Poughkeepsie's Mid-Hudson Civic Center. One song recorded then was "Dominance and submission", which ended up opening their "Extraterrestrial live" album; 1981, the Dictators played a gig, somewhere in New York. 12 songs from that gig ended up on "New York New York". On February 12, in 1965, Paul Revere & the Raiders recorded "Sweets for my sweet" at Los Angeles' Columbia Studios; 1970, Dusty Springfield recorded "Cherished" and "Goodbye" at Philadelphia's Sigma Sound Studios; 1976, Thin Lizzy recorded a BBC session, playing "Emerald", "Jailbreak" and "The cowboy song"; 1977, the Police recorded "Fall out" and "Nothing achieving" at London's Pathway Studios, for their debut 45; 1980, the Stiff Little Fingers recorded a BBC Peel session, playing "No change", "I don't like you", "Fly the flag" and "Doesn't make it all right". That's it for today, back to work! L8er, Jan. ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 14:19:15 +0000 From: Boldface Subject: Vegan restaurants (ignore if not interested) I was supposed to send this info to someone but accidentally deleted their address from my in-folder. So, if you're not vegan and not coming to London, just ignore this... Sorry. >>Most restaurants here have a decent vegetarian selection these days, and many of those dishes will actually be vegan anyway. Indian and Chinese restaurants, for example, if they serve a vegetarian meal there is unlikely to be anything in it that would be unsuitable for a vegan. (So long as you check that the noodles don't have egg in them and that cream isn't used in sauces... Well, I'm sure you know better than I what to watch out for.) However, the following two places have been recommended by one friend as fairly good and inexpensive: Bella Ricco, 56 Chapel Market N1 (Angel tube) Hare Krishna, Soho Square W1 (Tottenham Court Road tube) These are recommended by someone else that I know who is vegan: Carnivale, Whitecross Street EC1 (Old Street tube) Mildreds, 58 Greek Street W1 (Leicester Square tube)<< ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 14:57:58 +0100 From: "Jeroen Vedder" Subject: Re: Shake Some Action On Fri, 9 Feb 2001 Greg Shaw wrote; >>>> I'm pretty sure the Skydog stuff (Blues for Phyllis, etc) was recorded before they went to England, but I don't know exactly when or where.<<<<< Right, 1971 to be precise, most of these tracks were recorded in Danny Mihm's living room. >>>>>(Can't Explain? I'm hazy) <<<<< This is a session warm-up take, done for either 'Teenage Head' or 'Flamingo', the exact details can be found in an excellent new Roy Loney interview on www.i94.com And on Sun, 11 Feb 2001 ronald and karen sanchez wrote; >>>>>The other track cut at capitol was I Heard Your Name, which for some reason has never got a real release. In the late 70's Cyril was talking about some single he wanted to put out, and I mentioned that they should use I Heard Your Name as the flip. He liked that idea, but of course the planned single never came out.<<<<< 'When I Heard Your Name' can be found on the UK 'Move It' 45 (Sire SIR 4002). >>>>> This was when Jumpin In The Night was just being released in the UK. They didn't have a copy yet so they brought in some cassettes they had from the 1978 Rockfield sessions. Most of what they had was just backing tracks with no vocals! Curiously enough one of those was It Won't Be Wrong, the Byrds tune. This was never released, and I'm not sure that they even finished it. <<<<< 'It Won't Be Wrong' did turn up on the US edition of "Jumpin' In The Night', both 'Jumpin'' and 'Now' have different track listings on either side of the atlantic. Anyways, on why the Groovies never really made it; I always thought it was the strong reliance on other peoples material that did them in, esp when they had such great songwriting talent themselves. Sire UK failed to push any of the band's originals after SSA and the other 45s they put out were all covers; 'Don't You Lie To Me', 'Feel A Whole Lot Better', 'Move It' and 'Absolutely Sweet Marie'. Not a good move in the punk days when hero worship of 60s stars was at an all-time low. Live tapes from this area paint a simular picture with set-lists all most entirely devoted to the Beatles/Stones/Byrds songbooks. Jeroen Vedder ========================================== >>>>> New e-mail adress; chiswick@wanadoo.nl <<<<< ========================================== ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 08:45:12 -0600 From: Ron Thums Subject: Radio Rumpus Room 2/9/01 playlist Hey there folks, This week we debuted "Legend City," a great new comp of mid-Sixties Phoenix, Arizona garage sounds, courtesy of the good folks at Bacchus Archives/Dionysus. We also justified (to ourselves, anyway) splurging several months garage rent on a fat order of irresponsible noise from the Norton Records catalog. (I felt most fortunate to be able to replace my copy of "Surfin' In The Midwest, Vol.3" that disappeared itself a year and a half ago, but the Sixties Mexican and Peruvian garage on the Spanish Electro-Harmonix label continues to whack us 'longside our collective noggins as well!) Mindblower of the evening: Las Dilly Sisters -- a tiny yet tuneful pair of Mexican pre-adolescents who, back in 1968, covered the Standells' signature song in a most astounding manner. Check this damn thing out in this week's Real Audio archives and give your miserable life new meaning! As always we say "thanks" to the artists and labels responsible for producing tonight's music, and to the loyal listeners who encourage us to air it every week! (For six years now, Radio Rumpus Room has been broadcast Fridays at 9-10:30 p.m. on KFAI Fresh Air Radio, FM 90.3 Minneapolis and 106.7 St. Paul. The show streams live in RealAudio, and as always, our most recent shows are archived in their entirety in RealAudio -- check out the RRR web page to see what we've been up to!) Here's the Radio Rumpus Room playlist for Friday, February 9, 2001: SAVVY SHOW STARTER (ALWAYS LOCALLY RECORDED!) Safety Last -- Little Pig (CD-R) We squeezed a two-song CD-R outta this rockin' Minneapolis threesome, but are still waiting on the full enchilada. One of these days, right guys?!?!? Jackie and the Cedrics -- Mockingbird (Presenting Jackie and the Cedrics 10"; Norton) Powder Puffs -- You Can't Take My Boyfriend's Woodie (Surf Bunnies & Hot Rod Honeys; Superb) Untamed Youth -- Drag Race Tragedy (7"; Hillsdale) Van Dykes -- No Man Is an Island (Tellin' It Like It Is; Sundazed) Gants -- Six Days in May (Road Runner!: The Best of the Gants) Lori Wray -- Dirty Little Boy (Hisstory; Spitbite) The Hobbit -- Top of the Morning (Legend City: Phoenix's Viv-Debra Recording Studios 1965-'67; Bacchus Archives/Dionysus) Pretty Things -- Midnight to Six Man (Get the Picture?; Snapper) Bedlam Four -- No One Left to Love (7"; Caped Crusader) Michael & the Messengers -- Romeo & Juliet (Nuggets box; Rhino) Little Bits -- Girl, Give Me Love (Yeah Yeah Yeah; Cheep! Cheep!) Vaqueros -- Growing Pains (Get a Move On; Teenage Shutdown) Las Dilly Sisters -- Sometimes Good Guys Don't Wear White (The East Side Sound 1959-1968; Bacchus Archives/Dionysus) Premiers -- Daytona (Hot Rod Hop; Buffalo Bop) Competitors -- R.P.M. (The Hondells, Vol. 3: Aliases and Alternatives; ATM) Wheelmen -- School Is A/Gas (Revells' The GO Sound of the Slots!; Sundazed) World Famous Blue Jays -- This Car of Mine (Smiles, Vibes, and Harmony: A Tribute to Brian Wilson; DeMilo) Untamed Youth -- Girl and a Hot Rod (Some Kinda Fun!; Norton) Marauders -- Caliente (Surfin' In The Midwest, Vol. 3; Unlimited Productions) New World Relampagos -- El Tren de las Tres y Diez (New World Relampagos; Sirena) Los Locos del Ritmo -- Nena No Me Importa (Rock con Los Locos del Ritmo 10"; Electro-Harmonix) Keith Green -- Girl, Don't Tell Me (The Legendary of Gary Usher, Vol. 3; CD-R) Andre Williams & the Sadies -- She's a Bag of Potato Chips (Red Dirt; Bloodshot) Devvy Davenport -- Big Cowboy (Ordinary Rockin' Girls; White Label) Georgia White -- Hot Nuts (Get 'Em From the Peanut Man) (Men Are Like Street Cars...; MCA) Go-Nuts -- The Fabulous Go-Nuts Theme! (Dunk and Cover!; Lookout!) Los Saicos -- Demolicion (Los Saicos: Wild Teen Punk From Peru 1965 10"; Electro-Harmonix) And that was that! Coming up in two weeks: Our sixth annual midwinter "Day The Surf Stood Still" show, broadcast from the frozen shores of Minneapolis' Lake Calhoun! Break out your down-filled Hawaiian shirts and check out the instro-mentality! Ron ________________ RADIO RUMPUS ROOM: An unholy mix of surf, hot rod, rockabilly, '60s garage, psychedelia, primal pop and traditional and alt.country KFAI 90.3 FM (Minneapolis) and 106.7 FM (St. Paul) Now streaming live in RealAudio every Friday 9-10:30 p.m. CST Recent archived shows in RealAudio, playlists and much more at: http://www2.bitstream.net/~rumpus2/ ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 09:49:49 -0500 From: "Lindholm, Jeffrey" Subject: Rockpile reissue!?!?!? Ice, the CD new release newsletter in the US, says that Sony/Columbia's gonna reissue the Rockpile album from 1980 "remastered with bonus tracks." Anyone know if this just means the four Everly Brothers songs that came on the 7-inch record with the original album--which I think were already on the CD that's been out there--or some new tracks? ANd if new songs, which ones? And does the new reissue still have the Everly Brothers songs? Thanks for any or all answers. Jeffery Lindholm jrl6b@hscmail.mcc.virginia.edu University of Virginia Health System Communications and Public Relations ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 09:49:49 -0500 From: "Lindholm, Jeffrey" Subject: Rockpile reissue!?!?!? Ice, the CD new release newsletter in the US, says that Sony/Columbia's gonna reissue the Rockpile album from 1980 "remastered with bonus tracks." Anyone know if this just means the four Everly Brothers songs that came on the 7-inch record with the original album--which I think were already on the CD that's been out there--or some new tracks? ANd if new songs, which ones? And does the new reissue still have the Everly Brothers songs? Thanks for any or all answers. Jeffery Lindholm jrl6b@hscmail.mcc.virginia.edu University of Virginia Health System Communications and Public Relations ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 09:53:59 -0500 (EST) From: yeeyeemgt@webtv.net (Michael Quirk) Subject: Turning 35 Didn't get to NH, but did get to do Coffee N' Smokes 1st Anniversary Show in which I vowed that if Bo Belinsky nailed Tina Louise and Mamie Van Doren, heck, I'd still bang 'em now cuz I'm the horniest man on Earth. Of course, they'd have to get past the beautiful Miss Brenda, especially since she's having a more successful career than Tina and Mamie these days. Brenda had a car accident and hurt her back so we chose not to go to NH. We still had a good time nonetheless. Look forward to rockin' this month for JJ. MJ ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 07:06:41 -0800 From: "Lisa Rickenberg" Subject: RE: Texas garage compilations > The Mindrocker volume of Texas stuff is indeed fantastic. It's actually almost exactly the same as Acid Visions vol. 1, with one or two different tracks. I think it actually sounds a little better too (higher quality german vinyl, maybe?), but Acid Visions would probably be MUCH easier to get your mitts on. > > > I don't know if you can still get this, but Line Records of > Germany released > a pretty good Texas comp back in '82...it was vol. 4 of their MINDROCKER > series. > > ===> To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe bomp" to majordomo@xnet2.com <=== > > ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 11:07:20 From: jschwart@voicenet.com Subject: getting paid "BlackMonk \(Tom,as always\)" : >And I'd bet that if you asked any of these bands if they'd expect to be paid when someone reissues their singles 30 years from now, they'd say a very emphatic YES. I certainly couldn't blame them, especially if they never made any money for their efforts in the first place. However, they wouldn't all be that emphatic I don't think. Friends of mine who released a one-off, thoroughly-unsuccessful power pop 7" in the early '80s were recently contacted by some guy in Holland who wanted to put it on a comp, and wanted their permission to release it in exchange for, I think, ONE free copy of the CD. They said they really didn't care either way (if it were me, I would have insisted on at least many more copies in exchange for official permission, not that this project was worth suing over). Many (certainly not all) people who were in obscure old bands are happy that anybody still cares about what they did, and aren't worried about being paid for the memories. ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 11:11:16 From: jschwart@voicenet.com Subject: Groovies' "When I Heard Your Name" ronald and karen sanchez >The other track cut at capitol was I Heard Your Name, which for some reason has never got a real release. In the late 70's Cyril was talking about some single he wanted to put out, and I mentioned that they should use I Heard Your Name as the flip. He liked that idea, but of course the planned single never came out. As previously posted, the song was released as the flip of, er, one of the versions of "Shake Some Action," on a 45 by the German label Line Records at some point in the 1980s. It's a really good song, certainly deserving of wider exposure. ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 08:15:43 -0800 (PST) From: Iam Fuzzco Subject: Re: Rockpile reissue!?!?!? - --- "Lindholm, Jeffrey" wrote: > > > > Ice, the CD new release newsletter in the US, says > that Sony/Columbia's > gonna reissue the Rockpile album from 1980 > "remastered with bonus tracks." > > Anyone know if this just means the four Everly > Brothers songs that came on > the 7-inch record with the original album--which I > think were already on the > CD that's been out there--or some new tracks? > > ANd if new songs, which ones? > > And does the new reissue still have the Everly > Brothers songs? > > Thanks for any or all answers. I'm on a Nick Lowe list, and I have not heard ANYTHING about this. And there is no mention at: http://www.nicklowe.com/ As far as I can tell. __________________________________________________ ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 08:57:27 -0800 (PST) From: Iam Fuzzco Subject: Re: getting paid - --- jschwart@voicenet.com wrote: > > "BlackMonk \(Tom,as always\)" > : > > >And I'd bet that if you asked any of these bands if > they'd expect to be paid > when someone reissues their singles 30 years from > now, they'd say a very > emphatic YES. My old boss recorded and entire psych album for Capitol back in 60's. The album has since been re-released as a bootleg CD from Europe. He buys'em every chance he gets, so he can give them to friends and is thrilled that it is out there at all. He told me he'd like to know who is making, not because he wants to sue them or get royalties, but simple to find out WHY they chose his old band, and thank them (and maybe get some free CD's...) __________________________________________________ ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 08:57:27 -0800 (PST) From: Iam Fuzzco Subject: Re: getting paid - --- jschwart@voicenet.com wrote: > > "BlackMonk \(Tom,as always\)" > : > > >And I'd bet that if you asked any of these bands if > they'd expect to be paid > when someone reissues their singles 30 years from > now, they'd say a very > emphatic YES. My old boss recorded and entire psych album for Capitol back in 60's. The album has since been re-released as a bootleg CD from Europe. He buys'em every chance he gets, so he can give them to friends and is thrilled that it is out there at all. He told me he'd like to know who is making, not because he wants to sue them or get royalties, but simple to find out WHY they chose his old band, and thank them (and maybe get some free CD's...) __________________________________________________ ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 09:25:28 -0800 From: Alan Wright Subject: RE: bomp-digest V2001 #86 Not all the songs that Reed had a hand in feature him singing, some include only him playing guitar (or bass), such as "Why Don't You Smile Now." The Shades (or the Jades), his first group, does not feature him singing lead, just harmonies. There are actually two different versions of "Tiger In My Tank," one featuring tiger roaring sound effects (released by the Intimates), and one without (the Beechnuts). The more well-known version (w/o the roars) is on the "Everything You've Ever Heard About The V.U." bootleg collection, not that that would mean it has Reed on it - the collection also features a glaring mistake repeated again and again by bootleggers, the inclusion of "Afterhours" by the Carol Lou Trio, a piece of light cocktail jazz from the early '70s that Reed had nothing to do with. The confusion started because the song is credited to a "L. Reed," and has the same name as a V.U. song, but that's where the simularity ends. However, according to M.C. Kostek's "V.U. Handbook," Reed does appear on "Tiger," as the author did incredibly detailed research, including researchig Pickwick archives for session sheets that show songs Reed had a hand in as writer/session musican/etc. I once saw the Carol Lou Trio single on Ebay go for an incedible amount of money, and the seller even went so far as to claim it was an earlier version of the famed V.U. song, which is utterly insane, they don't sound at all alike (and the Carol Lou Trio song was recorded years AFTER the V.U., song!! Alan ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 12:43:44 -0500 From: "Lindholm, Jeffrey" Subject: RE: getting paid What band did your old boss record for, and is the album any good? Or is it a secret? Jeffery Lindholm jrl6b@hscmail.mcc.virginia.edu University of Virginia Health System Marketing and Communications > -----Original Message----- > From: Iam Fuzzco [SMTP:fuzzco66@yahoo.com] > Sent: Monday, February 12, 2001 11:57 AM > To: bomp@xnet2.com; bomp@screamer.xnet2.com > Subject: Re: getting paid > > > > --- jschwart@voicenet.com wrote: > > > > "BlackMonk \(Tom,as always\)" > > : > > > > >And I'd bet that if you asked any of these bands if > > they'd expect to be paid > > when someone reissues their singles 30 years from > > now, they'd say a very > > emphatic YES. > > My old boss recorded an entire psych album for > Capitol back in 60's. The album has since been > re-released as a bootleg CD from Europe. He buys'em > every chance he gets, so he can give them to friends > and is thrilled that it is out there at all. > > He told me he'd like to know who is making, not > because he wants to sue them or get royalties, but > simple to find out WHY they chose his old band, and > thank them (and maybe get some free CD's...) > > > > __________________________________________________ > > ===> To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe bomp" to majordomo@xnet2.com <=== ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 12:42:27 -0500 From: "Evan Davies" Subject: Attention Austin Bomp-ers! Hey you Austinites, please read the message below and get in touch with my e-pal Cathy if you're interested. - ---- This is directed at the Bomplist members who live in Austin, and I know there's a few of you. I'm in charge of SXSW Homestay - which means I find host homes for volunteers and indie film-makers coming in from out of town for the conference. (FYI - This is not band housing!) Anyone with a spare bed or a pullout couch (okay, even just a comfy couch) and the kindness to put up one or two (or more) folks for a few nights, please contact me. You'll earn some karma, my eternal gratitude (not much monetary value there unfortunately) and SXSW perks (like a music wristband). If you are interested e-mail Cathy at sonic5@well.com ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 09:49:23 -0800 From: Alan Wright Subject: RE: CCR/KKK So, what is the connection...or were you being sarcastic? Alan ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 12:48:30 -0500 From: "Lindholm, Jeffrey" Subject: RE: Rockpile reissue!?!?!? Don't have the ICE newsletter here at work, but will check it again tonight at home. That's all I know. Jeffery Lindholm jrl6b@hscmail.mcc.virginia.edu University of Virginia Health System Marketing and Communications > -----Original Message----- > From: Iam Fuzzco [SMTP:fuzzco66@yahoo.com] > Sent: Monday, February 12, 2001 11:16 AM > To: bomp@xnet2.com > Subject: Re: Rockpile reissue!?!?!? > > > > --- "Lindholm, Jeffrey" > wrote: > > > > > > > > Ice, the CD new release newsletter in the US, says > > that Sony/Columbia's > > gonna reissue the Rockpile album from 1980 > > "remastered with bonus tracks." > > > > Anyone know if this just means the four Everly > > Brothers songs that came on > > the 7-inch record with the original album--which I > > think were already on the > > CD that's been out there--or some new tracks? > > > > ANd if new songs, which ones? > > > > And does the new reissue still have the Everly > > Brothers songs? > > > > Thanks for any or all answers. > > I'm on a Nick Lowe list, and I have not heard ANYTHING > about this. And there is no mention at: > > http://www.nicklowe.com/ > > As far as I can tell. > > > > __________________________________________________ > > ===> To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe bomp" to majordomo@xnet2.com <=== ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 19:38:16 +0100 From: "Roberto Feruglio" Subject: Re: Compilation Standards Talking about comps I quoted as example the liner notes of the Outcasts' anthology "All of their singles are included on this compilation with the exception of their first (which was not up-to-par with their subsequent releases)". Then... >From: "Mike Dugo" Subject: Compilation Standards >It really pisses me off when a compilation or anthology leaves off a track or two due to standards...especially when there is obviously plenty of room to include it. Let ME decide what is or isn't up to "standards". I like MANY garage songs that get slammed by the majority of collectors, so let me hear the damn song, and I'LL decide if it's up to my standards...not the compilers. Sorry but I hadn't thought of the matter in that light. I wrote, "I need not to buy the comps that don't satisfy my standards". I decide. It doesn't matter compiler/collector/pal's conviction, but this doesn't prevent some songs from being evidently (without a doubt) out-of-place, compared to the others. I know there is no accounting for tastes, but I guess one must be deaf if he doesn't notice that difference. I haven't found the perfect comp series yet. Does it exist? More volumes = more songs I dislike. BFTG is my standard, nevertheless on it there are a few (very few) tracks that have not the same destroying power of the others, and they disappoint me. I'm sure the compiler was fully aware of that, but he liked them. Instead it's relatively easy to find a faultless single comp. I'm not surprised to hear someone who mentions "No No No" (and they're very many James!); I don't like that sound, but if I liked it I should be crazy about it. That's the best way of compiling. When you find some disappointing tracks, you can pass over them; bearing or skipping them, but you feel cheated. Coming back to Collectables' resolution: I think it's a noble purpose to spare my deception. I repeat... When it's obvious the disparity of quality. I said, "Many compilers should follow this example" because on a comp I cannot regret the lack of a track (maybe I could if the comp bases itself on the bands' geographical origin, who knows), but I can complain the presence. On an anthology (band/label's story) it's a question of completeness mainly. I remember Mouse & The Traps' "Public Execution" (Eva CD) which compiled all their singles: Eva had to fill room; or "Naw, Naw, Naw" on Liberty Bell's "Reality is the only answer": also a stone should refuse to hear... And the list goes on and on... But I was interested in the comps' discussion. Roberto ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 13:58:33 -0500 From: james Subject: Re: Compilation Standards I was upset that the "Yeah, Yeah, Yeah" comp was so lame compared to wonderful "No, No, No".... ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 14:10:41 +0000 From: "Linda" Subject: Vacation in Spain with Los Straitjackets... Man, this sounds like a blast... - -Linda - - - - - - - - - - - - - Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 13:10:57 -0500 From: Jake Guralnick To: Lsjunkmail Subject: Travel To Spain With Los Straitjackets!! That's right, BARCELO VIAJES Travel Agency in Madrid is offering a special travel Package from May 8-16, 2001 It is called Los Straitjackets' Rock & Roll Vacation. It includes flights from the USA to Spain, 8 nights of hotel rooms, travel arrangements within Spain, three special meals & 6 Los Straitjackets performances! Please follow the following link for more details & pricing: http://www.straitjackets.com/spain/spain.html For further information contact Hernando at ast-corrida@barcelo.com or via the Barcelo website at www.barcelo-viajes.es BARCELO VIAJES PH: 011--34 985350717 FX: 011- 34 985350677 ------------------------------ Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 14:33:01 EST From: Redlabour@cs.com Subject: Re: CCR/KKK (I seriously doubt it) Greetings, I think this whole associating white supremacy with decent rock n roll act is quite disheartening. I like to listen to (early) Siouxsie and the Banshees myself. She wore a Swastika arm band in one of her earliest show, circa 1977-1979. I also like Joy Division and New Order. I seriously doubt that they are white supremacist. In fact, I could be wrong, but I sense a GAY FRIENDLY lyrics in some songs like "Disorder" form Joy Division's debut UNKNOWN PLEASURES. The Smiths in the song "Hang the DJ" was complaining about the clubs playing "too much black music", but I really doubt that the Smiths or Morrisey are racists. Billy Bragg wouldn't have work or have anything to do with them. If I'm correct, the Smiths/Morrissey, Billy Bragg, the (English) Beat are supporters of British Labour Party , as far as I can tell, which indicates that they are a moderate shade of RED. For Bread and Roses, Melvin Little Email: redlabour@cs.com Homepage: http://ourworld.cs.com/redlabour/index.htm In a message dated 2/12/01 9:57:57 AM Pacific Standard Time, AlanW@SeattleArtMuseum.org writes: << Subj: RE: CCR/KKK Date: 2/12/01 9:57:57 AM Pacific Standard Time From: AlanW@SeattleArtMuseum.org (Alan Wright) Sender: owner-bomp@xnet2.com Reply-to: bomp@xnet2.com To: bomp-digest@xnet2.com ('bomp-digest@xnet2.com') So, what is the connection...or were you being sarcastic? Alan ===> To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe bomp" to majordomo@xnet2.com <=== ----------------------- Headers -------------------------------- Return-Path: Received: from rly-yh01.mx.aol.com (rly-yh01.mail.aol.com [172.18.147.33]) by air-yh02.mail.aol.com (v77_r1.21) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 12:57:57 - -0500 Received: from screamer.xnet2.com (xnet2.com [206.196.80.100]) by rly-yh01.mx.aol.com (v77_r1.21) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 12:57:45 -0500 Received: (from majordom@localhost) by screamer.xnet2.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) id LAA27670 for bomp-outgoing; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 11:45:15 -0600 Received: from babylon.seattleartmuseum.org ([216.122.111.11]) by screamer.xnet2.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id LAA27667 for ; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 11:45:12 -0600 Received: by BABYLON with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 09:49:26 -0800 Message-ID: <11658A9F54F9CF11870D006097677B9A0170A67C@BABYLON> From: Alan Wright To: "'bomp-digest@xnet2.com'" Subject: RE: CCR/KKK Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 09:49:23 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: owner-bomp@xnet2.com Precedence: bulk Reply-To: bomp@xnet2.com X-To-Unsubscribe: Send e-mail to majordomo@xnet2.com with "unsubscribe bomp" in the body X-Bomp-Web-Site: http://www.bomp.com X-BompList-Administrator: efd@xnet2.com >> ------------------------------ End of bomp-digest V2001 #87 **************************** ===================================================================== You've been reading bomp-digest, the digest version of the Bomp list. To unsubscribe, send "unsubscribe bomp-digest" to majordomo@xnet2.com